public:musings:watches:damasko:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
public:musings:watches:damasko:start [18/07/25 22:57 BST] – john | public:musings:watches:damasko:start [18/07/25 22:59 BST] (current) – [Update May 2022] john | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 360: | Line 360: | ||
Rate is now dropping after 2½ years of daily wear. Will monitor and wait for rate to exceed manufacturer' | Rate is now dropping after 2½ years of daily wear. Will monitor and wait for rate to exceed manufacturer' | ||
- | See dedicated page [[public: | + | See dedicated page [[repair_service_2022|]] |
===== Timegrapher Check 22/5/22 ===== | ===== Timegrapher Check 22/5/22 ===== | ||
Line 405: | Line 405: | ||
===== Update May 2022 ===== | ===== Update May 2022 ===== | ||
- | I've owned the DA36 now for over 5 years. After the repair, and getting the 2< | + | I've owned the DA36 now for over 5 years. After the repair, and getting the 2< |
The DA36 stays on the **left**. | The DA36 stays on the **left**. | ||
Line 418: | Line 418: | ||
- | Still well within [[public: | + | Still well within [[..:cosc|]] standards ( -4 / +6 ) at around -2s/d as of May 2022. Rolex now guarantee their watches to run better than COSC, at ±2 s/d. My DA36 has been within this range for the last few years, and is only now starting to fall outside that range. It may wander back towards //zero// over time. Who knows how all the different variables inter-react to make up the overall rate error, and how they vary with time? |
==== Time Grapher 23/5/22 ==== | ==== Time Grapher 23/5/22 ==== |
public/musings/watches/damasko/start.1752875845.txt.gz · Last modified: by john